EHR Vendor Intelligence
Which certified EHR systems hospitals actually run, vendor concentration, migrations and compliance posture.
Open EHR Vendor Intelligence -- in the sidebar under Access and Organizations.
Knowing which EHR an account runs changes how you sell to it, integrate with it, and support it. This view is built on the HealthIT.gov hospital promoting-interoperability CHPL linkage, which records the certified health IT each hospital attested to using.
KPI band
| Metric | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Hospitals linked | Hospitals resolved in the linkage file, deduplicated by facility |
| EHR vendors | Distinct certified developers in use |
| Top-3 concentration | Share of hospitals running one of the three largest vendors |
| Meet PI criteria | Share meeting promoting-interoperability criteria |
| EHR switches | Detected vendor changes |
Tabs
Market share
National vendor share, then vendor share by state. This is where entrenchment shows: a vendor with 15 percent nationally can hold 60 percent of one state.
Migrations
Detected vendor switches, the flows between vendors (who is losing to whom), and net flow per vendor. A hospital mid-migration is an unusually good moment to engage.
Territory
Facility-level planner. Filter to a geography and see exactly which hospitals run which system, so a territory plan can be built vendor-first.
Compliance
Vendor-level scorecard from the CHPL certification data: surveillance activity, non-conformities and open issues. A vendor with open non-conformities carries integration risk.
Important: the data model
This is the single most misread dataset in Qope. Read this before quoting a number from it.
- One row is a facility plus module, not a facility plus EHR. A hospital attesting to several certified modules produces several rows. Qope deduplicates by facility for the headline counts, but the raw table does not.
- The PI criteria flag uses
Y, notYES. Filtering the raw table forYESreturns nothing. - Bed-weighted analysis is not supported. The linkage file does not carry usable bed counts, so vendor share is by hospital count, not by bed count or by patient volume.
Coverage note
When the linkage file is larger than the analysis window, the footnote under the tabs states how many hospitals were analysed out of how many linkage records. If it says the sample does not cover all rows, treat state-level shares as indicative rather than exact.